The world seems to be deeply divided and polarised like never before. Trust in the media is plummeting, and the fact checkers, who act like modern gate keepers of information, but go unsupervised themselves, seem to make matters worse rather than better.
Dr David Seedhouse, Professor of Deliberative Practice at Aston University and a member of the Health Advisery and Recovery Team, HART(1), is concerned what it means for democracy when public debate is no longer public, but controlled by a small group of experts. Nowhere is this more clear, than in the decisions regarding the Corona pandemic.
To address this problem, a new online democratic tool has been developed by Dr. Seedhouse and his colleagues to allow people of all views to have their say. In their words:
Participants from any and every background are welcomed into this project. If you agree to participate:
1) You will join a private group on this website:
https://deliberativepractice.com (2)
2) Over a one-week period you will be invited to offer your opinion on a key issue in the pandemic;
3) At the start of the week you will be able to agree or disagree with a proposal for debate, and offer your reasons (this will take no more than five minutes or so);
4) During the week you will be able to read others’ responses and discuss as much or as little with others as you wish;
5) During the week balanced educational materials for and against the proposition will be available on the website;
6) You will be able to witness a debate (live or recorded) with advocates for and against. If we can arrange it, you will be able to question them;
7) At the end of the week you will be able to respond again to the key issue;
8) We will review the results and changes in opinion and make a report available to all participants. We will endeavour to publish the results widely in public fora and academic channels;
9) You can choose to be anonymous or not at your profile page. We will not publish any personal details outside the private group;
10) We comply with GDPR requirements and will not use your information for any other reason than stated above.
As soon as we have sufficient recruits we will begin. We are seeking participants from any and every background. All opinions are welcome. Nothing will be censored, hidden, or withheld. Everyone’s views and the patterns of their choices will be immediately available to all participants, and there are filters to enable those who wish to ‘deep dive’ into the data to do so.
To participate, email “I agree to be a member of this project” or similar to Dr David Seedhouse at david@values-exchange.com
(1)
https://www.hartgroup.org/
(2)
https://deliberativepractice.com The world seems to be deeply divided and polarised like never before. Trust in the media is plummeting, and the fact checkers, who act like modern gate keepers of information, but go unsupervised themselves, seem to make matters worse rather than better.
Dr David Seedhouse, Professor of Deliberative Practice at Aston University and a member of the Health Advisery and Recovery Team, HART(1), is concerned what it means for democracy when public debate is no longer public, but controlled by a small group of experts. Nowhere is this more clear, than in the decisions regarding the Corona pandemic.
To address this problem, a new online democratic tool has been developed by Dr. Seedhouse and his colleagues to allow people of all views to have their say. In their words:
Participants from any and every background are welcomed into this project. If you agree to participate:
1) You will join a private group on this website: https://deliberativepractice.com (2)
2) Over a one-week period you will be invited to offer your opinion on a key issue in the pandemic;
3) At the start of the week you will be able to agree or disagree with a proposal for debate, and offer your reasons (this will take no more than five minutes or so);
4) During the week you will be able to read others’ responses and discuss as much or as little with others as you wish;
5) During the week balanced educational materials for and against the proposition will be available on the website;
6) You will be able to witness a debate (live or recorded) with advocates for and against. If we can arrange it, you will be able to question them;
7) At the end of the week you will be able to respond again to the key issue;
8) We will review the results and changes in opinion and make a report available to all participants. We will endeavour to publish the results widely in public fora and academic channels;
9) You can choose to be anonymous or not at your profile page. We will not publish any personal details outside the private group;
10) We comply with GDPR requirements and will not use your information for any other reason than stated above.
As soon as we have sufficient recruits we will begin. We are seeking participants from any and every background. All opinions are welcome. Nothing will be censored, hidden, or withheld. Everyone’s views and the patterns of their choices will be immediately available to all participants, and there are filters to enable those who wish to ‘deep dive’ into the data to do so.
To participate, email “I agree to be a member of this project” or similar to Dr David Seedhouse at david@values-exchange.com
(1) https://www.hartgroup.org/
(2) https://deliberativepractice.com